Safety of rituximab in the routine treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Italy in patients refractory to anti-TNFa drugs: results from the observational retrospective-prospective RUBINO study

Submitted: 11 April 2014
Accepted: 30 August 2014
Published: 6 November 2014
Abstract Views: 2125
PDF: 1507
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The paper reports the results from the observational retrospective-prospective RUBINO study conducted in Italy to assess the safety of rituximab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in routine clinical practice. The percentage of patients who manifested at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AE) assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE v.3) during the observation period (primary objective) was evaluated. The percentage of patients manifesting a severe AE (SAE), clinical response to rituximab treatment, clinical remission according to disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28) criteria, markers of disease and quality of life were also assessed. Fifty-three Italian rheumatology centers took part in the study. Patients with a diagnosis of RA and inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor b (anti-TNFa) drugs were enrolled. Participating patients had previously received at least one cycle of rituximab, and treatment was still ongoing at the time of recruitment. Out of 205 patients enrolled, 60% manifested no form of AE, 14.2% had at least one grade 3 or 4 AE, and 11.2% patients reported an SAE. The overall percentage of patients manifesting AEs (40%) was lower compared to the DANCER (81% and 85%), REFLEX (85%) and RESET (85% and 69%) studies, but higher than that observed in the CERERRA registry (from 10.2% to 13.9%). This difference may be due to the shorter observation period applied in the CERERRA registry (only 12 months) compared to the RUBINO study (up to 3 years). All parameters of RA activity (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, health assessment questionnaire score, DAS28) improved significantly during the study.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Bazzichi, L., Biasi, D., Tinazzi, E., Muratore, M., Pellerito, R., Russo, R., … Astolfi, C. (2014). Safety of rituximab in the routine treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Italy in patients refractory to anti-TNFa drugs: results from the observational retrospective-prospective RUBINO study. Reumatismo, 66(3), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2014.748

Similar Articles

<< < 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.