https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2019.1114
Poncet’s disease diagnostic criteria decodes conundrum: Poncet’s vs pseudo Poncet’s
Submitted: 31 December 2017
Accepted: 6 September 2018
Published: 1 April 2019
Accepted: 6 September 2018
Abstract Views: 1388
PDF: 1009
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Poncet’s disease is very important and yet a challenging diagnosis of importance in countries with high TB endemicity (e.g. India). In this case series, we present 5 patients with diagnosed as Poncet’s disease and in our tertiary health care center over 12 months and examine the performance of the diagnostic criteria suggested by Sharma and Pinto. The majority (4/5) of the patients were subsequently diagnosed and responded to anti-tuberculous therapy. In the other patient, a diagnosis of atypical seropositive rheumatoid arthritis or Pseudo Poncet’s disease was established on follow up.
How to Cite
Shobha, V., & Desai, A. (2019). Poncet’s disease diagnostic criteria decodes conundrum: Poncet’s vs pseudo Poncet’s. Reumatismo, 71(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2019.1114
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Similar Articles
- L. Degli Esposti, V. Perrone, D. Sangiorgi, L. Sinigaglia, Assessment of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis eligible for biotechnological agents and evaluation of their healthcare resource utilization and related costs , Reumatismo: Vol. 73 No. 1 (2021)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
