https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2006.245

Does magnetic resonance represent the gold-standard of imaging for the follow-up of arthritis?

Vol. 58 No. 4 (2006)
Abstract Views: 824
PDF: 2259
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

M.A. Cimmino
office@pagepress.org
Several studies suggest that MRI is between 2 and 10 times superior to conventional radiology in the visualization of erosions. This higher sensibility is dependent on the specific joint assessed, the precocity of the disease, and the timing of follow-up. In addition, MRI can depict bone oedema, which is an early and reversible bone lesion, and evaluate the degree of inflammation of the synovial membrane. A single examination could therefore evaluate disease activity and damage. The sensitivity to change of articular MRI is good, as demonstrated by a number of follow-up studies. In view of these advantages, it may be surprising that MRI has not yet become the gold standard of imaging of the arthritic joint. The three main reasons are low availability of high field machines, examination’s costs, and lack of standardization of the technique. Low field extremity-dedicated MRI machines are probably the answer to the first two concerns. They have been shown to obtain reliable results for the clinician, and to be relatively cheap and patientfriendly, allowing repeated follow-up examinations. As far as standardization is concerned, there are many studies addressing the problem, with OMERACT as the driving force. MRI is likely to represent the future of the follow up of arthritis for the evaluation of its pace of progression and the effect of treatment. The advent of new and potent biologic therapies has incremented the need for more sensible imaging methods and will probably drive their diffusion in clinical practice.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

How to Cite

Cimmino, M. (2006). Does magnetic resonance represent the gold-standard of imaging for the follow-up of arthritis?. Reumatismo, 58(4), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2006.245

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.